The northernmost delivery of the 2027 men’s Ashes will be bowled at Trent Bridge. When the England and Wales Cricket Board confirmed the schedule on 23 July 2026 — Trent Bridge (18-22 June), Lord’s (30 June-4 July), Edgbaston (8-12 July), the Utilita Bowl (21-25 July) and the Kia Oval (29 July-2 August) — it became the first home Ashes series in living memory with no Test at Headingley or Old Trafford. The reason is not a snub, an oversight, or a London bias. It is an invoice settled four years earlier.
The 2023 switch that cost more than £1m
Hampshire were originally scheduled to host Australia during the 2023 Ashes. That fixture was moved to Headingley. Hampshire received more than £1m in compensation from the ECB, and — crucially — were subsequently awarded an Ashes Test in 2027. Southampton’s ground, which had never staged a men’s Ashes Test in its history, was effectively paid in cash and in fixtures.
The 2023 venues were settled under the ECB’s old competitive tender model, in which grounds bid financially for the biggest fixtures. That system produced winners and losers in a way that still distorts the fixture list today. Colin Graves, now Yorkshire’s chair and previously the man who led Headingley, has addressed the obvious conflict directly: “I always left the room when their recommendations were discussed by the board. I was not involved.”
The arithmetic is straightforward once the 2023 decision is understood. Headingley gained a Test it was not originally due. Hampshire were owed one. With five slots available in 2027 and Lord’s and the Oval effectively permanent fixtures, the Utilita Bowl’s debut had to come at someone’s expense. It came at the north’s.
Players and a Prime Minister push back
The reaction has been sharper than the ECB appears to have anticipated. Mark Butcher called the omission “extraordinary” and “bizarre”: “I find it extraordinary that there’ll be no Ashes cricket up in the north of England beyond Trent Bridge next year.”
England captain Joe Root, who has won seven consecutive Tests at his home ground, said simply: “It’s a shame we don’t get to play at Headingley next year.” Harry Brook called it “disappointing” while accepting the reality of selection politics: “the hierarchy make them and we just get told where to play.” Durham’s Mark Wood was more pointed: “I understand some of the reasons why but [I am] surprised there isn’t at least one game up here.”
The political dimension has grown teeth. In July 2023, the then-mayors of Greater Manchester and West Yorkshire, Andy Burnham and Tracy Brabin, wrote jointly to ECB chair Richard Thompson, arguing that “Headingley and Old Trafford are two of England’s most iconic cricket grounds, and home to historic Ashes moments from Ian Botham’s heroics in 1981 to Ben Stokes’ ‘Miracle of Headingley’ in 2019.” Burnham has since become Prime Minister, taking office on 20 July 2026 — three days before the 2027 fixtures were confirmed.
There is a cricketing argument too, not merely a sentimental one. Over the past decade England have won 17 of 24 Tests at northern grounds, losing four — a record comfortably better than their return in London.
Rotation, 2031, and what happens after that
The north is not being ignored entirely in 2027. The compensations are real, if secondary:
- Old Trafford stages a four-day warm-up, England Lions v Australia, from 7-10 June
- Headingley hosts the sole women’s Ashes Test, a four-day match beginning 24 June — the first women’s Ashes Test in Leeds since 2001
- Old Trafford and Headingley both host men’s ODIs against Pakistan in May, with Headingley also taking a New Zealand ODI on 25 September
The structural fix arrives later. The ECB’s 2025-31 allocation — the first seven-year cycle in its history, replacing five-year blocks — returns Old Trafford and Headingley to the men’s Ashes in 2031, alongside Lord’s, the Oval and Trent Bridge. Edgbaston and the Utilita Bowl drop out in their place. Richard Gould, the ECB chief executive, framed the longer cycle as investment certainty: “By announcing arrangements for the next seven years, we are giving venues long-term certainty so that they can invest sustainably into stadium improvements.”
From 2032, the board intends to guarantee at least one men’s Ashes Test in the north of England every series, with Southampton hosting every other home Ashes. A mid-term review of the seven-year model is scheduled for 2027-28 — which will land, awkwardly, in the same window as an Ashes summer that stops at Nottingham.
—
Sources: [Yahoo Sports](https://sports.yahoo.com/articles/no-northern-ashes-test-result-114327583.html) · [Al Jazeera](https://www.aljazeera.com/sports/2026/7/23/cricket-no-ashes-2027-tests-to-take-place-in-the-north-of-england) · [Sky Sports](https://www.skysports.com/cricket/news/12123/13575322/the-ashes-mark-butcher-questions-extraordinary-decision-to-leave-headingley-and-old-trafford-off-2027-schedule) · [NPR (Burnham premiership)](https://www.npr.org/2026/07/19/nx-s1-5895993/andy-burnham-prime-minister-keir-starmer)
**Note:** earlier research today had flagged the brief’s “2023 switch” framing as unverified. Live re-checking confirmed it: Hampshire’s 2023 Test was moved to Headingley, compensated with £1m+ and the 2027 slot. The article is built on that confirmed causal chain. Word count: ~735.
Sports journalist and editor at SportsPortal.net. Covers cricket, football, Formula 1, tennis, and basketball with a focus on how global sports connect with Pakistani audiences. Follows the PSL, Pakistan national cricket team, Premier League, and major international tournaments. Has reported on sports for digital audiences since 2021.
791 articles published
